The tool is not the answer.
A practitioner has just been ordered personally to pay $9,600 in costs — his breaches of duty including eleven AI-hallucinated authorities across two sets of submissions — Dey v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship (No 2) [2026] FedCFamC2G 1799. The lesson isn't to avoid the tools — it's that the tool is for efficiency, the judgement stays yours, and everything gets verified before it goes near the Court. How Probative builds that discipline into the software itself.
Read the article →